al Qaeda right or wrong? - Page 2 - Asian Massive Crew Community 2002/2020
Home Control Panel Gallery Chat Room Arcade Eye Candy Projects Multimedia Networking Search Sign Up

Advertisements



★ ♥ ★ A Multicultural Community that unites people from all over the world ★ ♥ ★
Go Back   Asian Massive Crew Community 2002/2020 > Forum for Guests > Topics & Posts For Public Viewing
Forgotten Your Password? Register
User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools

al Qaeda right or wrong?
 
Old 14-03-2004
¤«Çåm»®¤-'s Avatar
¤«Çåm»®¤-
Insane Poster
¤«Çåm»®¤- is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: »»»ßî®MíÑgµªm,
Posts: 1,327
¤«Çåm»®¤- is on a distinguished road
Status:
has no status.

al Qaeda right or wrong?


im sure every one as heard of al Qaeda. behide sep the 11 bombing and today it as reported they were behide the bombing in Spain!
wht are u views and thought about al Qaeda. do u think they are doing right fightting for islam or doing wrong!
As a muslim i think this as got notthing to do with islam no were in the quran says kill ppl like the way there are they call it the holy war yes i do know wht mean but the holy war can be done by praying 5 days a day coz ur fighting the evil off ! so in tht way ur fighting for islam coz his trying to get u to not to pray as u fight him off ur doing the holy war there are many ways to do it not like they way al Qaeda. are gonig about it plz have ur say in this matter ! cheers
long live Islam !


¤«Çåm»®¤-

Reply With Quote

5 Lastest Threads by ¤«Çåm»®¤-
Thread Forum Last Poster Replies Views Last Post
al Qaeda right or wrong? Topics & Posts For Public Viewing balti 18 99 14-03-2004 17:04


Old 17-03-2004   #11
Pagal Puri
Luving The Site
 
Pagal Puri's Avatar
 
Pagal Puri is offline
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: In a House
Posts: 479
female
Pagal Puri is on a distinguished road
My Mood:
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 0
Thanks (Received): 2
Likes (Given): 0
Likes (Received): 2
Dislikes (Given): 0
Dislikes (Received): 0
Status:
has no status.
Okies finally got a chance to get to this thread....wether Al-Queda is right or wrong i dont know for i dont know all the facts n figures but one thing i certainly do understand is after sept 11th (which that attack has been planted into our heads the very date) was supposedly caused by the Al-Queda a terrorist fanatical muslim group....

Since that day how much has been planned? How many countries attacked because of the "Al Queda Terrorist Network"? This has been one clever plan to fool alot of stupid sheep (Propaganda) take a fine example Iraq how many people dead 14,000 oh yeh but its okay because the west has "liberated" them. Im sure the women whilst they got raped by soldiers felt VERY liberated. Afganistan is under control Iraq getting there who is indeed next? The middle east is indeed a sore point for Mr Bush and Mr Blair lack of control? Lack of power? All i know is that no matter what happens even if bombs are planned themselves by the individual countries even if someone farts its gonna be the Al Queda Terrorist Network doing it. A part of me understands why ppl do what they do id pick up what ever i had to kill if i seen someone kill/abuse my family tear down our house ruin crops....

Saddam was placed in that seat of power thinkin he would be a good puppet who is to blame the greed of Saddam or the West for putting him there and who is paying now?!
This is before the war.....
"On 2 August 1990 the Iraqi army invaded its southern neighbour, Kuwait. Four days later the United Nations responded by imposing a complete trade embargo on Iraq. In the ten years since Iraq has continued to be the subject of sanctions that affect almost every aspect of life for the average woman, man and child.

With imports of food and medicine severely restricted, malnutrition and disease is now endemic in what was once one of the healthiest countries in the world. A 1999 Unicef report calculated that more than half a million children had died as a direct result of sanctions. On average 200 hundred Iraqi children are dying every day.

In September 1998, Denis Halliday head of the UN humanitarian programme in Iraq resigned claiming he could no longer administer 'an immoral and illegal' policy. His successor, Hans von Sponeck also later resigned, along with the head of the World Food Programme.

Meanwhile US and UK politicians insist that the sanctions regime is necessary to contain the threat of Saddam Hussein. When asked on US television whether the death of 500,000 Iraqi children as a result of sanctions was justified Madelaine Albright replied 'I think this is a very hard choice, but the price - we think the price is worth it.'

On 6 March 2000 the documentary 'Paying the Price: Killing the Children of Iraq' was broadcast on British television. It was written and presented by John Pilger and produced and directed by Alan Lowery.

This website explores and expands the arguments presented in the film: that the double impact of sanctions and bombing has had an unacceptable effect on the country of Iraq and its people; that the motives behind the embargo are anything other than humanitarian; and that US and UK politicians have avoided and distorted the truth in their arguments that sanctions should be maintained."

So Iraq was already being slowly crippled by who? For what reason? who is the terrorist network for real?????

The promised attack on Iraq will test free journalism as never before. The prevailing media orthodoxy is that the attack is only a matter of time. "The arguments may already be over," says the Observer, "Bush and Blair have made it clear . . ." The beating of war drums is so familiar that the echo of the last round of media tom-toms is still heard, together with its self-serving "vindication" for having done the dirty work of great power, yet again.

I have been a reporter in too many places where public lies have disguised the culpability for great suffering, from Indochina to southern Africa, East Timor to Iraq, merely to turn the page or switch off the news-as-sermon, and accept that journalism has to be like this - "waiting outside closed doors to be lied to", as Russell Baker of the New York Times once put it. The honourable exceptions lift the spirits. One piece by Robert Fisk will do that, regardless of his subject. An eyewitness report from Palestine by Peter Beaumont in the Observer remains in the memory, as singular truth, along with Suzanne Goldenberg's brave work for the Guardian.

The pretenders, the voices of Murdochism and especially the liberal ciphers of rampant western power can rightly say that Pravda never published a Fisk. "How do you do it?" asked a Pravda editor, touring the US with other Soviet journalists at the height of the cold war. Having read all the papers and watched the TV, they were astonished to find that all the foreign news and opinions were more or less the same. "In our country, we put people in prison, we tear out their fingernails to achieve this result? What's your secret?"

The secret is the acceptance, often unconscious, of an imperial legacy: the unspoken rule of reporting whole societies in terms of their usefulness to western "interests" and of minimising and obfuscating the culpability of "our" crimes. "What are 'we' to do?" is the unerring media cry when it is rarely asked who "we" are and what "our" true agenda is, based on a history of conquest and violence. Liberal sensibilities may be offended, even shocked by modern imperial double standards, embodied in Blair; but the invisible boundaries of how they are reported are not in dispute. The trail of blood is seldom followed; the connections are not made; "our" criminals, who kill and collude in killing large numbers of human beings at a safe distance, are not named, apart from an occasional token, like Kissinger.

A long series of criminal operations by the American secret state, identified and documented, such as the conspiracy that oversaw the "forgotten" slaughter of up to a million people in Indonesia in 1965-66, amount to more deaths of innocent people than died in the Holocaust. But this is irrelevant to present-day reporting. The tutelage of hundreds of tyrants, murderers and torturers by "our" closest ally, including the training of Islamic jihad fanatics in CIA camps in Virginia and Pakistan, is of no consequence. The harbouring in the United States of more terrorists than probably anywhere on earth, including hijackers of aircraft and boats from Cuba, controllers of El Salvadorean death squads and politicians named by the United Nations as complicit in genocide, is clearly of no interest to those standing in front of the White House and reporting, with a straight face, "America's war on terrorism".

That George Bush Sr, former head of the CIA and president, is by any measure of international law one of the modern era's greatest prima facie war criminals, and his son's illegitimate administration a product of this dynastic mafia, is unmentionable.

The rest of the answer to the incredulous question raised by the Pravda editors in America is censorship by omission. Once vital information illuminates the true aims of the "national security state", the euphemism for the mafia state, it loses media "credibility" and is consigned to the margins, or oblivion. Thus, fake debates can be carried on in the British Sunday newspapers about whether "we" should attack Iraq. The debaters, often proud liberals with an equally proud record of supporting Washington's other invasions, guard the limits.

These "debates" are framed in such a way that Iraq is neither a country nor a community of 22 million human beings, but one man, Saddam Hussein. A picture of the fiendish tyrant almost always dominates the page. ("Should we go to war against this man?" asked last Sunday's Observer). To appreciate the power of this, replace the picture with a photograph of stricken Iraqi infants, and the headline with: "Should we go to war against these children?" Propaganda then becomes truth. Any attack on Iraq will be executed, we can rest assured, in the American way, with saturation cluster bombing and depleted uranium, and the victims will be the young, the old, the vulnerable, like the 5,000 civilians who are now reliably estimated to have been bombed to death in Afghanistan. As for the murderous Saddam Hussein, former friend of Bush Sr and Thatcher, his escape route is almost certainly assured.

The column inches now devoted to Iraq, often featuring unnamed manipulators and liars of the intelligence services, almost always omit one truth. This is the truth of the American- and British-driven embargo on Iraq, now in its 13th year. Hundreds of thousands of people, mostly children, have died as a consequence of this medieval siege. The worst, most tendentious journalism has sought to denigrate the scale of this crime, even calling the death of Iraqi infants a mere "statistical construct". The facts are documented in international study after study, from the United Nations to Harvard University. (For a digest of the facts, see Dr Eric Herring's Bristol University paper "Power, Propaganda and Indifference: an explanation of the continued imposition of economic sanctions on Iraq despite their human cost", available from eric.herring@bristol.ac.uk)

Among those now debating whether the Iraqi people should be cluster-bombed or not, incinerated or not, you are unlikely to find the names of Denis Halliday and Hans von Sponeck, who have done the most to break through the propaganda. No one knows the potential human cost better than they. As assistant secretary general of the UN, Halliday started the oil-for-food programme in Iraq. Von Sponeck was his successor. Eminent in their field of caring for other human beings, they resigned their long UN careers, calling the embargo "genocide".

Their last appearance in the press was in the Guardian last November, when they wrote: "The most recent report ofthe UN secretary general, in October 2001, says that the US and UK governments' blocking of $4bn of humanitarian supplies is by far the greatest constraint on the implementation of the oil-for-food programme. The report says that, in contrast, the Iraqi government's distribution of humanitarian supplies is fully satisfactory...The death of some 5-6,000 children a month is mostly due to contaminated water, lack of medicines and malnutrition. The US and UK governments' delayed clearance of equipment and materials is responsible for this tragedy, not Baghdad."

They are in no doubt that if Saddam Hussein saw advantage in deliberately denying his people humanitarian supplies, he would do so; but the UN, from the secretary general himself down, says that, while the regime could do more, it has not withheld supplies. Indeed, without Iraq's own rationing and distribution system, says the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation, there would have been famine. Halliday and von Sponeck point out that the US and Britain are able to fend off criticism of sanctions with unsubstantiated stories that the regime is "punishing" its own people. If these stories are true, they say, why does America and Britain further punish them by deliberately withholding humanitarian supplies, such as vaccines, painkillers and cancer diagnostic equipment? This wanton blocking of UN-approved shipments is rarely reported in the British press. The figure is now almost $5bn in humanitarian-related supplies. Once again, the UN executive director of the oil-for-food programme has broken diplomatic silence to express "grave concern at the unprecedented surge in volume of holds placed on contracts [by the US]".

By ignoring or suppressing these facts, together with the scale of a four-year bombing campaign by American and British aircraft (in 1999/2000, according to the Pentagon, the US flew 24,000 "combat missions" over Iraq), journalists have prepared the ground for an all-out attack on Iraq. The official premise for this - that Iraq still has weapons of mass destruction - has not been questioned. In fact, in 1998, the UN reported that Iraq had complied with 90 per cent of its inspectors' demands. That the UN inspectors were not "expelled", but pulled out after American spies were found among them in preparation for an attack on Iraq, is almost never reported. Since then, the world's most sophisticated surveillance equipment has produced no real evidence that the regime has renewed its capacity to build weapons of mass destruction. "The real goal of attacking Iraq now," says Eric Herring, "is to replace Saddam Hussein with another compliant thug."

The attempts by journalists in the US and Britain, acting as channels for American intelligence, to connect Iraq to 11 September have also failed. The "Iraq connection" with anthrax has been shown to be rubbish; the culprit is almost certainly American. The rumour that an Iraqi intelligence official met Mohammed Atta, the 11 September hijacker, in Prague was exposed by Czech police as false. Yet press "investigations" that hint, beckon, erect a straw man or two, then draw back, while giving the reader the overall impression that Iraq requires a pasting, have become a kind of currency. One reporter added his "personal view" that "the use of force is both right and sensible". Will he be there when the clusters spray their bomblets?

Those who dare speak against this propaganda are abused as apologists for the tyrant. Two years ago, on a now infamous Newsnight, the precocious apostate Peter Hain was allowed to smear Denis Halliday, a man whose integrity is internationally renowned. Although dissent has broken through recently, especially in the Guardian, to its credit, that low point in British broadcasting set the tone. If the media pages did their job, they would set aside promoting the careers of media managers and challenge the orthodoxy of reporting a fraudulent "war on terrorism"; they owe that, at least, to aspiring young journalists. I recommend a new website edited by the writer David Edwards, whose factual, inquiring analysis of the reporting of Iraq, Afghanistan and other issues has already drawn the kind of defensive spleen that shows how unused to challenge and accountability much of journalism, especially that calling itself liberal, has become. The address is www.medialens.org

It is time that three urgent issues became front-page news. The first is restraining Bush and his collaborator Blair from killing large numbers of people in Iraq. The second is an arms and military technology embargo applied throughout the Gulf and the Middle East; an embargo on both Iraq and Israel. The third is the ending of "our" siege of a people held hostage to cynical events over which they have no control.


I am a disco dancer



 
Reply With Quote

Old 17-03-2004   #12
wyld chyld
Luving The Site
 
wyld chyld's Avatar
 
wyld chyld is offline
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: east london
Posts: 566
female
wyld chyld is on a distinguished road
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 0
Thanks (Received): 0
Likes (Given): 0
Likes (Received): 0
Dislikes (Given): 0
Dislikes (Received): 0

Status:
has no status.
man im jus gna say ne sort of terrorism is bad. jihad is sumthing totally diff 2 wat ppl knw!




 
Reply With Quote

Old 17-03-2004   #13
stella_artois
Needs Lessons
 
stella_artois's Avatar
 
stella_artois is offline
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: manchester
Posts: 63
male
stella_artois is on a distinguished road
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 0
Thanks (Received): 0
Likes (Given): 0
Likes (Received): 0
Dislikes (Given): 0
Dislikes (Received): 0

Status:
has no status.
pagal, you seem to have "forgotten" to have mentioned the anfal policy in your mammath post.

you should research the events that occured in the village of halabje in march 1988. approx 5,000 dead in one hour.

i agree, people have died as a result of the west liberating iraq, but i'm sure that in the long term less people will die, the only difference is that now the media are free to work there.

when saddam took over, iraqs economy outweighed that of countries such as portugal and greece. in 1999 it was more akin to the econonomies of countries in west africa.

i hope in a few years time the problems will have been ironed out, a government will be in place and iraq will prosper. maybe then some other middle eastern countries will adopt democracy? who knows




 
Reply With Quote

Old 17-03-2004   #14
Pagal Puri
Luving The Site
 
Pagal Puri's Avatar
 
Pagal Puri is offline
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: In a House
Posts: 479
female
Pagal Puri is on a distinguished road
My Mood:
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 0
Thanks (Received): 2
Likes (Given): 0
Likes (Received): 2
Dislikes (Given): 0
Dislikes (Received): 0
Status:
has no status.
hope in a few years time the problems will have been ironed out, a government will be in place and iraq will prosper. maybe then some other middle eastern countries will adopt democracy? who knows


Lmaoooooooooo Democracy hai hai is that what its called i thought it was liberation before thats what everyone seems to call it there are indeed two sides to every story but when u see the britz n the americans suckin out all they can (oil) for there own gain. As what the west call democracy its just a word as is terrorism to bully there way to a one world order to a super power that only they can have. So if i were u id get back to flickin the tit on ya head to get ur braincells workin


I am a disco dancer



 
Reply With Quote

Old 17-03-2004   #15
stella_artois
Needs Lessons
 
stella_artois's Avatar
 
stella_artois is offline
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: manchester
Posts: 63
male
stella_artois is on a distinguished road
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 0
Thanks (Received): 0
Likes (Given): 0
Likes (Received): 0
Dislikes (Given): 0
Dislikes (Received): 0

Status:
has no status.
well, you are knocking democracy yet live in a democratic country; your arguement is somewhat flawed




 
Reply With Quote

Old 17-03-2004   #16
pool_playa
Steamy Poster
 
pool_playa's Avatar
 
pool_playa is offline
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 236
male
pool_playa will become famous soon enough
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 0
Thanks (Received): 0
Likes (Given): 0
Likes (Received): 0
Dislikes (Given): 0
Dislikes (Received): 0
Status:
has no status.
i read about 2 para's of puri's essay and yes 2 sides to every story. <clap clap>


Attack on Spain was aimed at their government, through innocent people. so it was wrong end of.

We is limited on Telly and Newspapers on what we read/hear, but the internet has many sources to get news from (reliability can be questioned).

End of day, u reap what you sow. American put their puppet in power(sadam) who didnt play game in the end so they went in and finished him.

I personally would like 2 see saudi royal family removed. it wont happen cos they have pukka'd up and lips stuck to US spinster.





 
Reply With Quote

Old 17-03-2004   #17
Pagal Puri
Luving The Site
 
Pagal Puri's Avatar
 
Pagal Puri is offline
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: In a House
Posts: 479
female
Pagal Puri is on a distinguished road
My Mood:
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 0
Thanks (Received): 2
Likes (Given): 0
Likes (Received): 2
Dislikes (Given): 0
Dislikes (Received): 0
Status:
has no status.
no what im sayin is its all pretty words used for ppl to plough on with there bigger picture with a smile on there face of course its made out to be all these countries in the middle east are jahil ppl are so backwards etc if i had the opportunity n perhaps one day i will i would rather live in those holy lands than live in this country with its democracy but is it democracy when everything is dictated to u.... as far as im concerned ur heart will never be open to truth as it was meant to be good luck to u nipple face lataz ova n out cap'n


I am a disco dancer



 
Reply With Quote

Old 18-03-2004   #18
¤«Çåm»®¤-
Insane Poster
 
¤«Çåm»®¤-'s Avatar
 
¤«Çåm»®¤- is offline
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: »»»ßî®MíÑgµªm,
Posts: 1,327
male
¤«Çåm»®¤- is on a distinguished road
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 0
Thanks (Received): 0
Likes (Given): 0
Likes (Received): 0
Dislikes (Given): 0
Dislikes (Received): 0
Status:
has no status.
wow@puri thts a fucking killing tht abit too long cant be asked to read tht


¤«Çåm»®¤-



 
Reply With Quote

Old 19-11-2005   #19
balti
Wild Poster
 
balti's Avatar
 
balti is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,535
male
balti will become famous soon enough
My Mood:
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 18
Thanks (Received): 15
Likes (Given): 17
Likes (Received): 17
Dislikes (Given): 0
Dislikes (Received): 0

Status:
Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive
Al-Qaeda have been operating non stop:

Quote:
Daniel Pearl (1963–2002) was kidnapped and later beheaded by terrorists in Pakistan


Daniel Pearl (October 10, 1963 – February 1, 2002) was an American journalist for The Wall Street Journal. He was kidnapped and later beheaded by terrorists in Pakistan.

Pearl was working as the South Asia Bureau Chief of The Wall Street Journal, based in Mumbai, India. He was kidnapped when he went to Pakistan as part of an investigation into the alleged links between British citizen Richard Reid (known as the "shoe bomber") and Al-Qaeda. Pearl was killed by his captors.

In July 2002, Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, a British national of Pakistani origin, was sentenced to death by hanging for Pearl's abduction and murder.

In March 2007, at a closed military hearing in Guantánamo Bay, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, a member of Al-Qaeda, claimed that he had personally beheaded Pearl.

Researchers have also connected Al-Qaeda member Saif al-Adel with the kidnapping.

The Daniel Pearl Foundation was formed in 2002 in memory of Pearl, to promote the ideals that inspired his life and work. The Foundation works domestically and internationally to promote cross-cultural dialogue and understanding, to counter cultural and religious intolerance, to cultivate responsible and balanced journalism and to inspire unity and friendship through music.

Abduction

On January 23, 2002, on his way to what he thought was an interview with Sheikh Mubarak Ali Gilani at the Village Restaurant in downtown Karachi, Pearl was kidnapped near the Metropole Hotel at 7:00 p.m. by a militant group calling itself the National Movement for the Restoration of Pakistani Sovereignty.

The group claimed Pearl was a spy and—using a Hotmail e-mail address[23]—sent the United States a range of demands, including the freeing of all Pakistani terror detainees, and the release of a halted U.S. shipment of F-16 fighter jets to the Pakistani government.

The message read:


We give you one more day if America will not meet our demands we will kill Daniel. Then this cycle will continue and no American journalist could enter Pakistan.

Photos of Pearl handcuffed with a gun at his head and holding up a newspaper were attached. The group did not respond to public pleas for release of the journalist by his editor and his wife Mariane. United States and Pakistani intelligence forces tried to track down the kidnappers.

Death

Nine days later, the terrorists beheaded Pearl. On May 16, his severed head and decomposed body were found cut into ten pieces, and buried, along with an identifying jacket, in a shallow grave at Gadap, about 30 miles (48 km) north of Karachi.When the police found Pearl's remains, Abdul Sattar Edhi, a Pakistani philanthropist, collected all of the body parts and took them to the morgue. He helped ensure that Pearl's remains were returned to the United States, where he was later interred in the Mount Sinai Memorial Park Cemetery in Los Angeles.

On February 21, 2002, a video was released titled The Slaughter of the Spy-Journalist, the Jew Daniel Pearl.The video shows Pearl's mutilated body, and lasts 3 minutes and 36 seconds.

During the video, Pearl said:

My name is Daniel Pearl. I'm a Jewish American from Encino, California, USA. I come from, uh, on my father's side the family is Zionist. My father's Jewish, my mother's Jewish, I'm Jewish. My family follows Judaism. We've made numerous family visits to Israel.

Pearl condemned American foreign policy in the video. His family stated that he did so under duress, describing him as "a proud American, and he abhorred extremist ideologies." They also said that he gave signals that indicated that he did not agree with what he was saying. Following these statements, Pearl's throat was slit, and his head was severed.

The video concluded with the captors demanding the release of all Muslim prisoners in Guantanamo Bay.

They warned that, if their demands were not met, they would repeat such a beheading "again and again.


It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
Aristotle


 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Bookmarks

 
New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:43.

www.Asian-Massive-Crew.co.uk  | www.Asian-Massive-Crew.com  | www.AsianMassiveCrew.com  |   www.AsianMassiveCrew.co.uk  

 Graphics, Design & Layout  by Web Designerz - The Power To Create..!

Copyright © 2002 Onwards  www.Kalki.co.uk  | Website Hosted by Reality Host

   

DISCLAIMER: Every reasonable effort has been made, to make this site a peaceful yet an entertaining venue. 
The creator nor it's staff shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person, company or entity whatsoever, 
with respect to any loss, damages or misunderstandings arising from any information or speculation contained
in any of the topics and its updates. Each member is responsible for his/her own thoughts of action when expressed!